QUOTE (prander @ Nov 17 2008, 09:12 PM)

My thought...
By "knowing how people work" on an emotional / empathic level, he can "empathically intuit" a person's power.
It seems to not be very different, in effect, than how peter "empathically absorbs". You'll notice that Peter never had mastery over the powers he absorbed unlike Sylar having mastery when he "stole" directly via the brain. But you'll notice that Sylar didn't have mastery when he "empathically intuited" Elle's electricity power.
It seems that Peter's power is "always on" and he can't control what powers he absorbs (at least not yet, if he gets his power back). I'd say that Sylar's power is likewise always on, can be used for any facet of life and is a driving force, hence "the hunger". However, he can now choose how to get others' powers... either directly via the brain or through "empathic intuiting".
But his power is still intuitive aptitude, or a "super intuition".
thats a really good observation since he said "i guess i havent figured this out yet" when he was using Ells electricity.
Cool stuff, so if he crys he gains power lol
Either way it was a great seen for both characters to develop,
Also -- Arthur mentioned the "Hunger" being about power, i always thought it wasn't just about power but also about "knowing how things work" or more importantly
knowledge. This theory was backed that even though Peter had Nathans power in the future, because of the hunger he attempted to figure out why he was acting the way he did by cutting his head sylar style. Interesting that the writers are contradicting themselves on this subject..