Okay, the new revelation in the first few episodes was that Sylar was really a Petrelli, a full-blooded brother of both Nathan and Peter. But then HRG basically said that it was just Angela and Arthur Petrelli taking advantage of his issues and that he's basically Gabriel Gray. But this could actually be HRG screwing with his head to try to get an advantage too just like it's plausible that the Petrellis are trying to manipulate Sylar. So which is it?
I personally was really getting to believe in the Petrelli theory myself with the corroborating evidence for it but now there's a possibility it's all back to the original origin story? What do people think? Is it better that Sylar be Gabriel Gray or Gabriel Petrelli? Which makes more sense? Or is better storytelling-wise?
Pro Petrelli:
- Angela first tells Sylar that he's her son and Arthur then confirms her words by telling Mohinder to quit beating on the unconscious Sylar because Sylar's his son. Other than their meeting in Angela's dream, how would they coordinate on deceiving Sylar? Would they even cooperate on this despite their current enmity?
- In the future, the Gabriel living in Costa Verde with his son, Noah, and Mr Muggles is wearing a Presidential Chef apron (in reference to Nathan being President) and tells present Peter that they're brothers even though they had 4 years to actually verify this fact with a simple DNA test and/or further research. Plus, even if that future will never come to pass, it's not like it can modify the past or certain biological relations.
- Arthur specifically instructs Daphne to recruit Sylar and knows all about him as he says "I've been waiting for him for a long time" as if he's been behind the scenes manipulating Gabriel/Sylar all along (which would explain Elle's weird mission, how Sylar was saved by Candice or why Sylar wasn't exterminated immediately the first time HRG captured him).
- The ability to take/absorb powers is rather rare in the Heroes-verse and it seems strange that Arthur automatically knows that Sylar's power has a facet unknown to Sylar before Arthur told him about it. If the GNs are canon, the aura absorption ability DEFINITELY does not work the same way even though it basically has the same effect as stealing powers as Arthur's with the additional side effect of killing the victim. Arthur's assumption that Sylar's power works the same as Peter's seems to be way too confident when chances are he could be so wrong. This also feeds into the whole behind-the-scenes vibe of grooming Gabriel into becoming Sylar.
Pro Gray:
- Not enough is known about the Gray family to determine whether they are Sylar's adoptive or biological family with any certainty.
- It's possible that Gabriel is a special born to 2 normals or he inherited his gene from the unknown Gray father as it's still possible that unrelated people share similar abilities since West (S2) and Nathan have flight while Claire and Adam have regeneration (at least I don't think they're related).
- There's enough information in a psychological profile on Sylar that the two Petrelli elders know that his weakness is his issues with his family.
- If Angela always knew that Gabriel was her son then why tell him now when allies are few and far in between? Why not tell Sylar earlier to prevent a scene where it's Brother against Brother, if she loves her kids so much (I mean she freaking tried to kill Arthur for trying to kill Nathan!)?
- Nathan would definitely be old enough to remember if there were another younger brother that he had (he's like 12 years older than Peter) so unless the Haitian was used or Sylar was Peter's twin and thus easily given away at the same time that Peter was brought home from the hospital, the sudden disappearance of a third Petrelli son should have left some marks on the family, right?
What do you guys think?
PS I posted this under a general Sylar Appreciation thread but was told that this probably merited its own thread and I kinda realized that it did.
