QUOTE (conspiracytheory @ Dec 15 2008, 09:56 PM)

Did you watch The Dark Knight? Batman punched like thirty guys over the course of the film. Dogs attacked him. Harvey Dent punched that guy in the courtroom. Two Face shot a half dozen people. Cars exploded. Buildings exploded. That one guy with the cell phone in his stomach exploded.
Brawling happened.
---
Anyway, everybody who has been like, "I don't get why Nathan wants to round up all the heroes," is totally right on. He has no motivation to go all megalomaniacal on us that isn't horrid and contrived. Left a bad taste in my mouth.
what i was saying was, that the movie didn't have huge fights that people tend to like to see, for example, in the x-men films, the terminator films (specifically the future war parts), the star wars films, lord of the rings, the matrix trilogy, etc... i use these as examples, because it seemed like people were expecting to see peter and the rest of the heroes face off against sylar and the other villains in one spectacular showdown.
and don't get me wrong, i LOVED the dark knight, but anyways, i guess what i'm trying to get at here is that a tv series or film doesn't necessarily have to have a big single face-off between two groups of people to be great. i'm thinking that the writers of heroes had this in mind when developing the story for each season - and of course, some people won't think it all that great, but that's just opinion.
as for nathan, at the very end, it fast-forwarded to three weeks later. i'm almost certain that volume 4 will touch upon the events that happened within that gap of time, and we'll get to see nathan's true motivation behind it.