This post is quite long so don't feel like it must be read. Most items in this post are
not about Heroes.
QUOTE (Visitor27 @ Apr 15 2009, 06:44 PM)

Say, Goodnight Gracie dates back to the 1930's, but most likely was known to the girls due to the popularity of the George Burns and Gracie Allen TV - and much like a lot of popular culture sayings STILL became jokes after the association had been forgotten, as it was only 1961, that would be only four years after the their TV show went off the air. The joke is much like "walk this way" - and then the person walks JUST like the other person.
Here is on the meaning of the saying in a
googleIt's been used on many other shows with the name "gracie" replaced with any other name, that's the saying - not to mention the many episodes of Tv shows from Will and Grace to The Gilmore Girls have used the saying in their titles.
Thank you for the explanation. I've not viewed the two shows given as examples.
QUOTE (Visitor27 @ Apr 15 2009, 06:44 PM)

I know people don't mean anything by it, but saying that Alice is slow, or has some kind of Learning Disability is insulting to those, like myself, who have learning disabilities. LD has nothing to do with that - dyslexia for example is a word processing issue.
If Alice had had an issue, any issue, It would have been talked about, that Angela was the older sister to a child like that. From a story POV and for that time period it is important.
I absolutely never intended to insult anyone in any of my posts. Please forgive me if I did say anything insulting or in an insulting manor. I have had much training working with Special Needs individuals including the United States Navy and Occupational Therapy offices. To do that I've had to take many college classes in psychology as well as abnormal psychology classes. I've also taken classes at college concerning special education. On top of all of that both my and my husbands families have more than our share of special needs individuals, as well as both our children. I have posted all this before.
I have never been down on anyone with special needs. I actually get upset and frustrated with people who
will not be supportive of anyone at all, let alone than those who need a little more consideration.
Your point about the show bringing it up if someone did have a special need though is probably not correct since most people, including the writters do not understand what special needs are or what qualifies someone in this area. Too few people really know what to look for unless they are in a job situation to do so. There are also many people who do not even know they have a special need until a child is properly diagnosed. (My spouse was over 40 years old before finding out about being on the Autism spectrum. Holding a good paying job but never socially able to completely fit in. It was a shock to say the least but still the same person. After finding out it has helped quite a bit.)
Autism is becoming epidemic. One new person every 8 minutes is being officially diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum somewhere in the US (the rate is similar other places in the world also). 1 out of every 150 people (adults and children). That is only one set of diagnosis. (There have been at least a few threads on this website dealing with Autism very sensitively.)
Back in the 60's (and sometimes even up till the middle 90's), many diagnosis known today were not understood then. It doesn't mean that people didn't have special needs back then, just that people didn't understand why some people needed a bit more attention. Thomas Jefferson is a good example of a historical figure with special needs but most do not think of him in that way. Jane Austin's book "Pride and Predjuce" is another good example. It was written at least 100 years before Hans Asperger or Leo Kanner's ideas were published(mid 40's). Mr. Darcy is the most obvious (Asperger) character in the book but their are at least 8 special need individuals in that one story alone. Many of us had read this story as required reading in high school yet wouldn't think to bring it up in a conversation about individuals with special needs. It just gets passed over though many are familiar with it (or have read it at the least once).
Young
Alice Shaw had enough possible diagnosable traits to at least raise a red flag to look into it further. If a child like Alice (minus super abilities of course) were to come into my office I would feel compelled to begin looking toward Autism Spectrum or some type of LD with what I'd see concerning Alice. Ruling out what isn't there is just as important as noticing what is there or possibily there in a person.
QUOTE (Visitor27 @ Apr 15 2009, 06:44 PM)

It was a different time and a much more innocent time for children back then, 12 or 13 is not the 12 or 13 today - she was truly that believing, and there are still people out there like that, but it's the time. But what people are forgetting, which has been noted here is there we're two reasons she stayed..
1. A person who see's the future and is the older sister she trusts and looks up to told her she would be safe there
2. She wanted to shield the world from her.
She would be a danger in a large city.
Absolutely. I made this same point in my origional post. I agree 100% with everything in your above quote with the exception in italics. Yes, it was the time back in the 60's to be more trusting in general but that wasn't the
only explanation concerning Alice.
I am not fussing at you. Also, no argument was ever intended.
Just stating my reasons and my qualifications so there wouldn't be any doubts about me.
I have stated it as my opinion and backed it up with facts from the episode stating why I've said what I said.